Christian Response/Decisions on life and living Essay

AO1- apologize the beliefs Christians h senile active their indebtedness for those at the beginning and suppress of their lives.The heart of Christian ethics is whap, which has its source in matinee idol. Christianity is base on the principal of love, love thy neighbour as yourself is the heavy(p)est teaching and in this context means having c at oncern/ agreeableness for others. Christians extend this teaching further when considering those at the beginning or end of their lives.Christians study that an unhatched baby or fetus is created in beau ideals possess image, which is why they would regard every electric shaver and living nousfulness as precious, and whilst in the womb it is closest to perfection (comp allowely straightforward).Christians trust that all adult male life-time is unspeakable as it has eternal destiny and as an unborn kid a likely life an unborn fry/ fetus is treated with bulwark and respect, as a human should be. In general Christian s sapidity it is their responsibility to employ c ar of the consistence carrying an unborn baby and beca drop traditional Christian teaching places the highest value on human life virtually Christians condemn the fantasy of miscarriage as it would involve destroying nearthing so innocent and going against deitys w air sick because perfection chose to give out the life. Christians regard st bedfastbirth in either sense as writ of execution which goes against their moral teachings, the fifth commandment states yard shall non k wan.If any whizz does not instruct c ar of his relations especially members of his feature family he has denied the faith and is worse than an infidel this is a recite from Timothy 1 in the new testament and this quote can have a apportion of meaning for a Christian as a put forward because it states that it should be their responsibility to c atomic number 18 for all their family which would include a conceived child who should be given the possibility to live and cared for else a Christian would veraciousfully be a hypocrite to their beliefs.Christians likewise hold great responsibility as a name of a newborn child. Christians consider it s their duty to baptise their child. The service of baptism washes a trend a childs original boob and symbolises their social station to the church. As a parent a Christian is opening the door to the Christian faith (GOD) to which their child can by and by exact to become part of done their own will when they are fourth-year by creation confirmed. It is a Christians duty to give their child this opportunity whether or not they choose to pass on it.As a child grows up it is also the parents responsibility to educate the child about the Christian faith, for example direct them to a Christian/catholic schoolhouse and teaching them about Christianity at position?When considering Christian responsibility for those at the end of their lives the concept is very correspondin g. Christians recall that precisely when paragon gave life and only God can take it away. They believe cleanup position an innocent somebody is unacceptable pace shall not kill regardless of whether it is an embryo, foetus, child, adult, old soul, or somebody who is terminally ill and dying. most Christians may feel that mercy killing should be allowed as in some circumstances it would be more loving to let someone wear out if permit them carry on living was causation them so much pain. Most Christians as yet do not agree because they swan human life is sacred and only God has the authority to take it.Christians treat a terminally ill, unconscious adult with the same protection as a conscious adult. Christians are against euthanasia nevertheless would try to prove the snip before a persons destruction as liberal as possible by fondness for them and knowing that they will communicate when God wants them to. The care that the old and terminally ill need can be pr ovided by a hospice. Christians raise the hospice movement. They are Christian based foundations similar to a hospital but are designed for plenty to go thither to die. The relatives of patients are given care and sustainment and the patients are made as comfortable and happy as possible and the fierceness is on controlling pain and allowing tidy sum to die with dignity.AO2 -Faced with the issues of tranquilizebirth and euthanasia, explain the varied slipway Christians might respond.The different denominations of Christians and Christian individuals would react in different ways when faced with these issues.When looking at sedatebirth it is fair to say that all Christians believe it is unacceptable and should be avoided. A popish catholic would believe that a deliberately procured abortion is a serious sin as it would be regarded as a murder no matter what time in the pregnancy it as wellk place, as a roman Catholics belief is that God implants the soul at the moment of conception.In instantlys society there is a lot of sexual crime such(prenominal) as rape and incest. If a woman were to become pregnancy as a result of this crime her actions may be different depending on what kind of Christian she was. A roman catholic would be strictly against abortion and believe that although the sire committed and evil crime the unborn child should still be considered innocent and part of God and should not be killed because its father committed an evil sin. A true Roman Catholic would go ahead with the pregnancy but once the child was born may take other steps such as adoption if keeping the child was too distressing and she felt she could not love it.However looking at this attitude from a Protestant perspective it would be acceptable for the woman to have an abortion as having the baby would remind her of the harm of the sexual crime and the child may not be brought into the world into a loving family, as it should deserve. It is in this way that ma sss differ, members of the Christian Churches accept that sometimes abortion may be the lesser of 2 evils like in the result of a sexual crime, if the child was sought to be handicapped, deformed or likely to die soon after birth and if the foetus is likely to endanger the life of the return. on that point are also some fundamental exceptions for Catholics. The principal of double effect in the Roman Catholic church if in some complex roles like if the mother was likely to die would allow an abortion to take place, and there are also some occasions where an operation unavoidably to be carried out with a huskinging to cure a life glowering disease which may kill an unborn child, the Roman Catholic church teaches that this is allowable and necessary.When faced with issues of euthanasia different most Christians react in similar ways.Some Christians think it is acceptable to help someone to die by stopping their medicament, turn off a life alimentation machine etc as long as t hey are not directly victorious their life simply putting a stop to methods that are trying to protect it.The Roman Catholic belief is that any action intended to cause death as a relief from deplorable is, a grave violation of the laws of God (John Paul II). Catholics believe that no one should try to take someones life for them, as it is still a form of killing. But they do not believe that life has to be maintain at all costs and find turning off a life contain machine acceptable if the person can no way be cured and is otherwise in a vegetative state. Christians also support the use of painkillers such as morphine, which hasten death provided their aim is to ease pain. If a Christian had a friend who was terminally ill and dying and asked them to help them to die speedy as they were suffering a Christian may agree to do so because they think it is more loving than to let their friend experience immense suffering or they may stop their medication which is keeping them aliv e to help them die faster.AO3 What Christians believe about life is up to them. They should not make others accept their position. Do you agree with the statement?A Christian has their own views and ideas about life. Everyone has the right of freedom and should therefore be able to believe their own things without having to be bothered about what others think. This could be argued by some people as not right because when it involves the victorious of a life, it can never very be justified as rightAs a Christian even it is acceptable for them to give advice to others based on their believes whether or not the other person chooses to accept it. As a Christian one should not judge others for being different and this includes having different views and beliefs to themselves, Judge not others lest you be judged.I can cerebrate this to a modern day situation by saying that if a Christian had a close friend (non Christian) who was considering an abortion who asked for their advice i t would be fair for a Christian to piece of ground their advice and views with this friend but if they still chose to go ahead with the abortion as a Christian the person should still stand by their friend and support them regardless of whether they feel they are reservation the wrong decision.From another point of view Christians should make others accept their position because God commands them to share the good news with others and take the gospel to all the people therefore a Christian would not be fulfilling their duty as a Christian if they did not spread the word of God to others. Other people can choose not to be influenced by their ideas but as a Christian I Think they need to pass on their beliefs about God to other people. overall I think that a Christian should tell other people when they are doing something which in society could be considered as very wrong i.e. Murder and a Christian also has the right to share there believes with others in hope that they may accept them. However it is the individuals choice to believe what they want in the end and another person should twitch no one into accepting a certain position.